Another view. We must have other eyes on our manuscripts no matter how painful the corrections and comments. It's too easy to write alone, get lost in our own words, not see ambiguity, sentence weaknesses, lack of clarity. We have to seek constructive criticism. Without it, we can't possibly get better.
I hope someone reading this post is a high school or college student who's angry or disillusioned by a harsh review of a beloved composition. Maybe even a middle-aged new writer who has submitted a story to a publisher or a writing group like CritiqueCircle.com and been disappointed by a lack of enthusiastic response. It's always a shock to discover our words did not reach a reader as we intended.
Get help. Like other people devoted to their craft, writers all over the world willingly help each other. CritiqueCircle.com is a terrific (and free) mutual-help community. Members can also learn by seeing mistakes and problems in the writing of others.
Don't accept every critique as golden. There are as many different reading tastes as food preferences and varieties of dogs. Take a look at the writing style and reading habits of the person critiquing you (found on the site in CC member profiles). See what that person said about stories you also critiqued. Critiques on a story often vary widely--many readers sense something wrong but don't know what it is or how to fix it. Realize that the best they've told you may be that something doesn't quite work. Occasionally someone does not know how to give opinions in a kind or helpful manner, but I think those instances on Critique Circle are rare. Members on the site gain experience in critiquing. In most cases writers can find the reactions they need (though not always what they want), often by knowledgeable people.
Before you show your manuscript to someone else, give yourself a different perspective. Look at it in a different format. Widen the margins so the page looks like the page of a book. Don't rely on the grammar and spelling checker--PRINT a proof copy. Mistakes jump out--typos, unnecessary repetitions, poor transitions, and so on. To save paper, look at the document in your word processor's two-page view. This view allows you to see across paragraphs and pages and spot all kinds of weaknesses. (After I edit in normal screen view, I go to the two-page view and spend time tweaking. I love the two-page view.)
Finally, if you're going to show the manuscript to anyone--a friend or someone online--never say "I haven't had time to edit this but I just wanted to get your opinion." I hope you see the problem in that.
Showing posts with label drafting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label drafting. Show all posts
Sunday, February 26, 2012
Wednesday, July 6, 2011
Write chapter summaries as you draft
I've always hated to write summaries, but in working on my current project, I actually found them useful.
Instead of waiting till the final draft to tackle the dreaded task, I started writing a summary as I finished each chapter. But I didn't begin to do this until I was more than half way through the first draft, so I had to catch myself up, reviewing and writing summaries for all the chapters up to that point.
The first good thing about it was the way it ended my confusion about what was happening at particular points in the story. That's why I did it. I was lost.
I still hate this kind of writing, but heartily recommend you write summaries as you go along. It's easier when everything's fresh. Use the summaries as a reference to keep yourself straight. When you write the next draft, revise them as necessary. When someday a publisher asks to see your first fifty pages and your chapter summaries, the summaries will be seasoned veterans.
Instead of waiting till the final draft to tackle the dreaded task, I started writing a summary as I finished each chapter. But I didn't begin to do this until I was more than half way through the first draft, so I had to catch myself up, reviewing and writing summaries for all the chapters up to that point.
The first good thing about it was the way it ended my confusion about what was happening at particular points in the story. That's why I did it. I was lost.
The second, unexpected good thing was how the summaries showed problems, contradictions, and inconsistencies. I found chapters where there was nothing much happening, or too much. Plot threads I'd forgotten about and hadn't carried forward.
I still hate this kind of writing, but heartily recommend you write summaries as you go along. It's easier when everything's fresh. Use the summaries as a reference to keep yourself straight. When you write the next draft, revise them as necessary. When someday a publisher asks to see your first fifty pages and your chapter summaries, the summaries will be seasoned veterans.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
